تبیین جایگاه مصرف انرژی در مدل ارزیابی حمل و نقل منطقه کلانشهری تهران بر اساس شاخص‌های توسعه پایدار

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکدۀ مدیریت و اقتصاد، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

2 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه علوم انتظامی امین، تهران، ایران

3 استاد، دانشکدۀ مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران

4 استاد، گروه حمل‌ونقل، دانشکدۀ مهندسی عمران، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

حمل‌ونقل از مهم‌ترین مصرف‌کنندگان انرژی شناخته شده و دستیابی به حمل‌ونقل پایدار متضمن کنترل و بهبود میزان مصرف انرژی است. در این مسیر، نظامی برای ارزیابی سیستم حمل‏ونقل شهری مبتنی بر اصول پایداری و توسعۀ پایدار، می‏تواند به بهبود شاخص‏های اقتصادی، اجتماعی و زیست‏محیطی شهرها کمک کند. مطالعۀ حاضر با هدف بررسی جایگاه مصرف انرژی در مدل ارزیابی حمل‏ونقل منطقۀ کلان‌شهری بر اساس شاخص‏های توسعۀ پایدار صورت پذیرفت. این پژوهش از نظر هدف، کاربردی‌ـ توسعه‏ای و از منظر روش و دورۀ زمانی گردآوری داده‏ها، پژوهشی پیمایشی‌ـ مقطعی محسوب می‌شود. مطالعات کتابخانه‏ای و پرسشنامه به عنوان ابزار گردآوری داده‏ها در نظر گرفته شد. در بخش کیفی با جست‌وجو، در بازۀ زمانی 2000 تا 2023، 41 مقاله به روش هدفمند انتخاب و تحلیل شدند. برای شناسایی مقوله‏های تحقیق و ارائۀ مدل اولیه، از تحلیل فراترکیب استفاده شد و 9 مؤلفه و 53 شاخص شناسایی شد. اعتبارسنجی و غربالگری شاخص‏ها با تکنیک دلفی انجام شد. مشارکت‌کنندگان این بخش 28 نفر خبره بوده که با الگوی گلوله برفی انتخاب شدند. درنهایت‌، 9 مؤلفه و 49 شاخص تأیید شدند. در پایان، با استفاده از فرایند تحلیل شبکه اولویت و وزن ابعاد، مؤلفه‏ها و شاخص‏ها تعیین شد. یافته‏ها نشان داد بعد زیست‌محیطی دارای 45 درصد وزن مدل است و بعد اقتصادی، 36 درصد وزن مدل را دارد. بعد اجتماعی با 19 درصد در جایگاه سوم قرار گرفته است. مؤلفۀ مصرف انرژی با 17 درصد بیشترین وزن را داشته و شاخص‏های آن 3 جایگاه از 10 جایگاه برتر را داشتند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Clarifying the Place of Energy Consumption in The Transport Evaluation Model of The Metropolitan Area Based on Sustainable Development Indicators

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Hossein Norouzi 1
  • Mohammad Javad Kameli 2
  • Jamshid Salehi Sadaghiani 3
  • Shahriar Afandizadeh 4
1 PhD candidate, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Public Administration, Amin University of Police Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Professor, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran
4 Professor, Department of Transportation, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Transportation is known as an important energy consumer, and achieving sustainable transportation implies controlling and improving the amount of energy consumption. So, a system for evaluating the urban transportation system based on the principles of sustainability can help to improve the economic, social and environmental indicators. This study was conducted with the aim of clarifying the place of energy consumption in the transportation evaluation model based on sustainable development indicators. This research is applied-developmental in terms of purpose, and in terms of the method and time period of data collection, it is considered a survey-cross-sectional research. Library studies and questionnaires were considered as data collection tools. In the qualitative section by searching, in the period from 2000 to 2023, 41 articles were selected and analyzed. Meta-composite analysis was used to identify the research categories and present the initial model, and 9 components and 53 indicators were identified. Validation and screening of indicators was done with Delphi technique. The participants of this section are 28 experts who were selected using the snowball pattern. Finally, 9 components and 49 indicators were confirmed. In the end, using the process of network analysis, the priority and weight of dimensions, components and indicators were determined. The findings showed that the environmental dimension has 45% and the economic dimension has 36% of the weight of the model. The social dimension is ranked third with 19%. The energy consumption component has the most weight with 17% and its indicators have 3 positions out of the top 10.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Energy Consumption
  • Metropolitan Area
  • Mixed Approach
  • Sustainable Development Indicators
  • Urban Transportation System Evaluation

مراجع

  • Hepburn C, Qi Y, Stern N, Ward B, Xie C, Zenghelis D. Towards carbon neutrality and China's 14th Five-Year Plan: Clean energy transition, sustainable urban development, and investment priorities. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology. 2021; 8:120-130.
  • Pettersson F, Stjernborg V, Curtis C. Critical challenges in implementing sustainable transport policy in Stockholm and Gothenburg. Cities. 2021; 113:143-153.
  • Azizian G, Rizvani A, Rajabi A. Presenting the optimal model of urban transportation in Tehran with an emphasis on localized clean energies. Geography and Regional Planning. 2022; 12(46):284-312. [Persian]
  • Yousefnejad M, Pouratakash M, Siddiqui A. Measuring citizens' satisfaction with public transportation management. Geography and Human Relations. 2022; 5(1):175-195. [Persian]
  • Bakhshisanjdari R, Daryabari J. Investigating the smartness of urban transportation systems in line with the sustainable development of cities. Urban Economics and Management. 2020; 8(32):31-46. [Persian]
  • Vosughi R. Rail connection of satellite towns with mother metropolises: dos and don'ts. Tehran: Tehran Urban Research & Planning Center; 2018. [Persian]
  • Jomepour M, Talebian N. A comparative study of the effect of the metropolis of Tehran on the marginalization of the suburbs (the case study of the cities of Shahryar and Lavasan). Local development (rural-urban). 2018; 10(1):29-48. [Persian]
  • Hatami-Nejad H, Zamani Z, Haji-Nejad S, Judri M. Pathology of new cities in Iran. Sepehr. 2013; 22(88):17-31. [Persian]
  • Marzi R, Ghalamro S, Abbaspour G. Evaluation of Kermanshah urban train project based on sustainable urban transportation system. Urban and Regional Policy. 2022; 1(2):66-84 [Persian].
  • Parsaeian A. Measuring the impact of the urban transportation system on improving the environmental quality of urban spaces. Urban Futures. 2022; 2(1):79-95. [Persian]
  • Mishra R, Rani P, Cavallaro F, Hezam I M, Lakshmi J. An integrated intuitionistic fuzzy closeness coefficient-based OCRA method for sustainable urban transportation options selection. Axioms. 2023; 12(2): 144-165.
  • Naseri A, Estelaji F, Samani A, Omidfar R, Zahedi R, Yousefi, H. Simulating the performance of HOV lanes for optimal urban traffic management. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. 2024; 23:1-16.
  • Yousefi H, Moradi S, Zahedi R, Ranjbar, Z. Developed analytic hierarchy process and multi criteria decision support system for wind farm site selection using GIS: A regional-scale application with environmental responsibility. Energy Conversion and Management: X. 2024; 22: 1-12.
  • Kaza N. Urban form and transportation energy consumption. Energy Policy. 2020; 136:14-28.
  • Hopkins D, Branb C. Energy and Transport Planning. International Encyclopedia of Transportation. 2021; 2021:214-219.
  • Brand C, Anabel J L, Marsden G. The role of energy demand reduction in achieving net-zero in the UK: Transport and mobility. Conference: ECEEE 2022 Summer Study, At: Hyeres, France. 2022.
  • Naderan A, Ghahramanlou A, Safarzadeh M, Javanshir H. Mechanism of influence of urban form and land use on transportation and air pollution of Tehran metropolis. Bagh Nazar. 2022; 19(109):35-46. [Persian]
  • Satterthwaite D. Barbara ward and the origins of sustainable development. 1st London: International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED); 2006.
  • Hirai T, Comim F. Measuring the sustainable development goals: A poset analysis. Ecological Indicators. 2022; 145: 589-605.
  • Gatta V, Marcucci E, Nigro M, Serafini S. Sustainable urban freight transport adopting public transport-based crowdshipping for B2C deliveries. European Transport Research Review. 2019; 11(1): 1-14.
  • Goldman T, Gorham R. Sustainable urban transport: Four innovative directions. Technology in society. 2006; 28(1-2): 261-273.
  • Diao M. Towards sustainable urban transport in Singapore: Policy instruments and mobility trends. Transport policy. 2019; 81: 320-330.
  • Marjani T, Pourabdi M R, Saidi L, Alireza M. Presenting a sustainable technology evaluation model in Tehran's urban transportation field. Urban Economics and Management. 2018; 6 (22): 1-18. [Persian]
  • Beck C T. A meta-synthesis of qualitative research. MCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing. 2002; 27(4): 214-221.
  • Zimmer L. Qualitative meta‐synthesis: a question of dialoguing with texts. Journal of advanced nursing. 2006; 53(3): 311-318.
  • Finegold-Kant D. A Guide to Qualitative Metasynthesis. 1st Tehran: Hime; 2021 [Persian]
  • Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. springer publishing company; 2006.
  • Habibi A, Afridi S. Multi-indicator decision-making. 1st Tehran: Naron Publications; 2022. [Persian]
  • Tehran Urban Research & Planning Center. Compilation of strategies for managing the effects of satellite cities trips on Tehran city based on collecting tolls and explaining its requirements and methods. Tehran: Tehran Urban Research & Planning Center; 2018 [Persian]
فصلنامه سیستم های انرژی پایدار
دوره 3، شماره 1
دی 1402
صفحه 89-112

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار