Economic and Environmental Comparison of Various Fluids in a Carbon Capture System Using the Brayton Cycle with Recompression and Recuperation Cycles

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Master’s student in Energy Systems, Faculty of Energy and Sustainable Resources, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor of Energy Systems Group, Faculty of Energy and Sustainable Resources, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

10.22059/ses.2024.383314.1102

Abstract

Population growth, especially in developing and less developed countries, leads to increased energy demand, particularly for electricity. As the need for electricity rises, so does the consumption of primary energy sources, especially fossil fuels. However, this trend poses significant risks due to global warming and its impact on climate change. Additionally, considering the carbon footprint taxes projected for the coming years, addressing this issue becomes even more critical. In this research, the objective is to identify the optimal working fluid among four candidates: Methane, Methane Flue Gas, Syngas, and Syngas Flue Gas. The study evaluates their economic and environmental advantages. Furthermore, it investigates how the carbon mass fraction in each working fluid affects economic and environmental parameters. As part of this analysis, a combined cycle integrating a Brayton cycle with a solar-heliostat cycle is proposed. In this configuration, solar energy replaces the boiler to provide heat for the turbine’s working fluid. The goal is to achieve cost reduction and environmental sustainability.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Yin JM, Zheng QY, Peng ZR, Zhang XR. Review of supercritical CO2 power cycles integrated with CSP. International Journal of Energy Research. 2020;44(3):1337-69.
  2. Sifat NS, Haseli Y. A critical review of CO2 capture technologies and prospects for clean power generation. Energies. 2019;12(21):4143.
  3. Peters GP, Andrew RM, Canadell JG, Friedlingstein P, Jackson RB, Korsbakken JI, et al. Carbon dioxide emissions continue to grow amidst slowly emerging climate policies. Nature Climate Change. 2020;10(1):3-6.
  4. Van Ruijven BJ, De Cian E, Sue Wing I. Amplification of future energy demand growth due to climate change. Nature communications. 2019;10(1):2762.
  5. Beck C, Rashidbeigi S, Roelofsen O, Speelman E. The future is now: How oil and gas companies can decarbonize. McKinsey & Company. 2020;7.
  6. Liao G, Liu L, Jiaqiang E, Zhang F, Chen J, Deng Y, et al. Effects of technical progress on performance and application of supercritical carbon dioxide power cycle: A review. Energy conversion and management. 2019;199:111986.
  7. Li B, Wang S-s, Xu Y, Song L. Study on the off-design performance of supercritical carbon dioxide power cycle for waste heat recovery of gas turbine. Energy Conversion and Management. 2021;233:113890.
  8. Du Y, Yang C, Wang H, Hu C. One-dimensional optimisation design and off-design operation strategy of centrifugal compressor for supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2021;196:117318.
  9. Crespi F, Gavagnin G, Sánchez D, Martínez GS. Analysis of the thermodynamic potential of supercritical carbon dioxide cycles: a systematic approach. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power. 2018;140(5):051701.
  10. Yao L, Zou Z. A one-dimensional design methodology for supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycles: Integration of cycle conceptual design and components preliminary design. Applied Energy. 2020;276:115354.
  11. Ding H, Zhang Y, Hong G, Li J. Comparative study of the supercritical carbon-dioxide recompression Brayton cycle with different control strategies. Progress in Nuclear Energy. 2021;137:103770.
  12. Salim MS, Saeed M, Kim M-H. Performance analysis of the supercritical carbon dioxide re-compression brayton cycle. Applied Sciences. 2020;10(3):1129.
  13. Chen Y, Wang M, Liso V, Samsatli S, Samsatli NJ, Jing R, et al. Parametric analysis and optimization for exergoeconomic performance of a combined system based on solid oxide fuel cell-gas turbine and supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle. Energy Conversion and Management. 2019;186:66-81.
  14. Liu Z, Liu Z, Cao X, Luo T, Yang X. Advanced exergoeconomic evaluation on supercritical carbon dioxide recompression Brayton cycle. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;256:120537.
  15. Chen M, Zhao R, Zhao L, Zhao D, Deng S, Wang W. Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle: Intelligent construction method and case study. Energy Conversion and Management. 2021;246:114662.
  16. Yu A, Su W, Lin X, Zhou N. Recent trends of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle: Bibliometric analysis and research review. Nuclear Engineering and Technology. 2021;53(3):699-714.
  17. Merchán R, Santos M, Medina A, Hernández AC. High temperature central tower plants for concentrated solar power: 2021 overview. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2022;155:111828.
  18. Cao Y, Habibi H, Zoghi M, Raise A. Waste heat recovery of a combined regenerative gas turbine-recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle driven by a hybrid solar-biomass heat source for multi-generation purpose: 4E analysis and parametric study. Energy. 2021;236:121432.
  19. Ostermann M. Model Predictive Control and Moving Horizon Estimation for Solar Tower Power Plants: Analysis and Adaptations to the Experimental Facility Solar Tower Jülich: University of Stuttgart; 2024.
  20. Li M-J, Li M-J, Jiang R, Du S, Li X-Y. Study on the dynamic characteristics of a concentrated solar power plant with the supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle coupled with different thermal energy storage methods. Energy. 2024;288:129628.
  21. Zhao Y, Chang Z, Zhao Y, Yang Q, Liu G, Li L. Performance comparison of three supercritical CO2 solar thermal power systems with compressed fluid and molten salt energy storage. Energy. 2023;282:128807.
  22. Hu F, Wang Z. Integration design and control strategy of sCO2 Brayton cycle for concentrated solar power system. Energy Reports. 2023;9:2861-8.
  23. Wang S, Asselineau C-A, Fontalvo A, Wang Y, Logie W, Pye J, et al. Co-optimisation of the heliostat field and receiver for concentrated solar power plants. Applied Energy. 2023;348:121513.
  24. Xie Q, Guo Z, Liu D, Chen Z, Shen Z, Wang X. Optimization of heliostat field distribution based on improved Gray Wolf optimization algorithm. Renewable Energy. 2021;176:447-58.
  25. Chen J, Liu L, Liao G, Zhang F, Jiaqiang E, Tan S. Design and off-design performance analysis of supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycles for gas turbine waste heat recovery. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2023;235:121295.
  26. Shokouhi Tabrizi AH, Niazmand H, Farzaneh-Gord M, Ebrahimi-Moghadam A. Energy, exergy and economic analysis of utilizing the supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle integrated with solar energy in natural gas city gate station. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. 2021;145:973-91.
  27. Chen L, Shen J, Ge Y, Wu Z, Wang W, Zhu F, et al. Power and efficiency optimization of open Maisotsenko-Brayton cycle and performance comparison with traditional open regenerated Brayton cycle. Energy Conversion and Management. 2020;217:113001.
  28. Yang J, Yang Z, Duan Y. Part-load performance analysis and comparison of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles. Energy Conversion and Management. 2020;214:112832.
  29. Liu H, Chi Z, Zang S. Optimization of a closed Brayton cycle for space power systems. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2020;179:115611.
  30. Jin Q, Xia S, Chen L. A modified recompression S–CO2 Brayton cycle and its thermodynamic optimization. Energy. 2023;263:126015.
  31. Khatoon S, Kim M-H. Preliminary design and assessment of concentrated solar power plant using supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycles. Energy Conversion and Management. 2022;252:115066.
  32. Ma Y-N, Hu P, Jia C-Q, Wu Z-R, Chen Q. Thermo-economic analysis and multi-objective optimization of supercritical Brayton cycles with CO2-based mixtures. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2023;219:119492.
  33. Zareh AD, Saray RK, Mirmasoumi S, Bahlouli K. Extensive thermodynamic and economic analysis of the cogeneration of heat and power system fueled by the blend of natural gas and biogas. Energy conversion and management. 2018;164:329-43.
  34. Zoghi M, Habibi H, Choubari AY, Ehyaei M. Exergoeconomic and environmental analyses of a novel multi-generation system including five subsystems for efficient waste heat recovery of a regenerative gas turbine cycle with hybridization of solar power tower and biomass gasifier. Energy Conversion and Management. 2021;228:113702.
Journal of sustainable Energy Systems
Volume 3, Issue 3
July 2024
Pages 289-301

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics