Journal of sustainable Energy Systems

Journal of sustainable Energy Systems

Idea generation and examination of environmental challenges of floating solar photovoltaic power plants on wetlands and its economic advantage for local communities

Document Type : Original Article

Author
Mohammad Ali Allah Rabbi Shirazi
Master of Energy Systems Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
10.22059/ses.2024.377595.1070
Abstract
This article deals with floating solar photovoltaic power plants on wetlands and examines their environmental challenges and economic benefits for local communities. Due to the world's move towards renewable energy due to the negative effects of fossil fuels, FPV systems are presented as a suitable solution for areas with land constraints. FPV technology involves floating solar panels on water with a cooling effect, increasing productivity and reducing land use. This paper examines the advantages and disadvantages of implementing FPV on wetlands, including reduced water evaporation and algal growth, along with challenges such as equipment corrosion and impact on aquatic ecosystems. In addition, the current study examines the economic implications for local communities and emphasizes job creation, skills development and economic stimulation through local industries and services. Despite the environmental concerns of the plan, such as disruption of aquatic habitats and possible loss of biodiversity, strategic planning and necessary actions can address these issues. This paper emphasizes the benefits of FPV systems in promoting clean energy and supporting local economies, and suggests the need for further research to optimize their integration into sensitive wetland ecosystems. At the end, a case study was carried out on the Maharlu wetland of Fars province for the proposed idea that with only 8.33% of the total area of ​​the Maharlu wetland, a floating solar power plant with a nominal capacity of 10.03 MW can be set up.
Keywords
Floating Solar Photovoltaic Power Plant
Wetland
Environmental Challenges
PVsyst
Maharlu Wetland
Subjects
  • Arun Kumar V, Rashmitha M, Naresh B, Bangararaju J, Rajagopal V. Performance analysis of different photovoltaic technologies. In: Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on advanced electronic systems (ICAES), 978-14799–1441-8/13/$31.00 ©2013 IEEE.
  • Rahman MM, Hasanuzzaman M, Rahim NA. Effects of various parameters on PV-module power and effi Energy Convers Manag 2015;103:348–58. Alok Sahu, Neha Yadav, K. Sudhakar, Floating photovoltaic power plant: A review, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Volume 66, 2016, Pages 815-824, ISSN 1364-0321, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.051.
  • Sahu Yashpal, Shahabuddin M, Pooja Agrawal. Floating solar photovoltaic system: an emerging technology. NSPCEP II, ISBN 978-93-84743-43-7©2015
  • Floating Solar Market, Precedence Statistics, October 2023, https://www.precedenceresearch.com/floating-solar-market.
  • Essak L, Ghosh                Floating photovoltaics:      A             review. Clean        Technol 2022;4(3):752–69.
  • Badhoutiya A. Advancements in PV technology-floating photovoltaics. In: 2023 5th international conference on smart systems and inventive technology. ICSSIT, IEEE; 2023, p. 382–5.
  • Li Z, Chen D, Feng X, Chen J-F. Hydroelastic analysis and structural design of a modular floating structure applying ultra-high performance fiber-reinforced concrete. Ocean Eng 2023;277:114266.
  • Ravichandran N, Ravichandran N, Panneerselvam B. Review on the structural components of floating photovoltaic covering systems. Intelligent manufacturing and energy sustainability. Springer; 2022, p. 125–33.
  • Choi, Young-Kwan. “A Study on Power Generation Analysis of Floating PV System Considering Environmental Impact.” International Journal of Software Engineering and its Applications 8 (2014): 75-84.
  • Claus R, López M. Key issues in the design of floating photovoltaic structures for the marine environment. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2022;112502.
  • Trapani K. and Redón Santafé M. (2015), A review of floating photovoltaic installations: 2007–2013. Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl., 23: 524–532. doi: 1002/pip.2466.
  • Pu Kowsar, Sumon Chandra Debnath, Nawshad Haque, Md Saidul Islam, Firoz Alam; Design of a 100 MW solar power plant on wetland in Bangladesh. AIP Conf. Proc. 17 November 2022; 2681 (1): 020072. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0114976.
  • Exley, A. Armstrong, T. Page, and I. D. Jones, “Floating photovoltaics could mitigate climate change impacts on water body temperature and stratification” Sol. Energy, vol. 219, no. March, pp. 24–33, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2021.01.076.
  • M. Almeida et al., “Floating solar power: evaluate trade-offs,” Nature, vol. 606, 2022.
  • Grippo, J. W. Hayse, and B. L. O’Connor, Solar Energy Development and Aquatic. Ecosystems in the Southwestern United States: Potential Impacts, Mitigation, and Research Needs” Environ. Manage., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 244–256, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0384x.
  • Kosciuch, K., Riser-Espinoza, D., Gerringer, M., & Erickson, W. (2020). A summary of bird mortality at photovoltaic utility scale solar facilities in the Southwestern U.S. PLoS ONE, 15(4), 1–21. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0232034.
  • M. Cook and R. H. McCuen, “Hydrologic Response of Solar Farms” J. Hydrol. Eng., vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 536–541, 2013, doi: 10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0000530.
  • Sahu A, Yadav N, Sudhakar K. Floating photovoltaic power plant: A review. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews. 2016;66:815.
  • Rosa-Clot M, Tina GM, Nizetic S. Floating photovoltaic plants and wastewater basins: an Australian project. Energy Procedia. 2017;134:664-74.
  • Gojendro, Sadokpam & Ch, Basudha & Das, Sanjay & Bharti, Vidya & Peetambari, Ningthoujam & Bidyasagar, Sanjenbam & Meetei, Wakambam & Sharma, Phurailatpam. (2023). WETLANDS: IMPORTANCE AND CONSERVATION STRATEGY FOR THE LOOSING ECOSYSTEM. 3. 73 - 79.
  • Haas, J. Khalighi, A. de la Fuente, S.U. Gerbersdorf, W. Nowak, Po-Jung Chen, Floating photovoltaic plants: Ecological impacts versus hydropower operation flexibility, Energy Conversion and Management, Volume 206, 2020, 112414, ISSN 0196-8904, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112414.
  • Pierre-Alexandre Château, Rainer F. Wunderlich, Teng-Wei Wang, Hong-Thih Lai, Che-Chun Chen, Fi-John Chang,Mathematical modeling suggests high potential for the deployment of floating photovoltaic on fish ponds, Science of The Total Environment, Volume 687, 2019, Pages 654-666, ISSN 0048-9697, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.420.
  • Learned, K., & Kinas, H. (2017). A Jurisdictional Review: Wildlife and Wind Energy Development. Retrieved from rockies.ca.
  • US Department of Energy, “Solar Impacts on Wildlife and Ecosystems” no. November 2021.
  • Hamed, T. A., & Alshare, A. (2022). Environmental Impact of Solar and Wind energy A Review. Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems, 10(2), 1–23. doi:10.13044/j.sdewes.d9.0387.
  • Exley, G., Hernandez, R. R., Page, T., Chipps, M., Gambro, S., Hersey, M., … Armstrong, A. (2021). Scientific and stakeholder evidence-based assessment: Ecosystem response to floating solar photovoltaics and implications for sustainability. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 152(September), 111639. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111639.
  • Lebel, C. Y. (2020). Solar and Stormwater: Plan Better to Avoid Me. Natural Resources & Environment, 34(3), 50–52.

 

Journal of sustainable Energy Systems
Volume 3, Issue 1
Winter 2024
Pages 39-51