Journal of sustainable Energy Systems

Journal of sustainable Energy Systems

A Comparative Analysis of the Energy Consumption Pattern Reform Law with OECD Countries' Experiences

Document Type : Review Paper

Authors
Negin Mirzaei 1
Shayesteh Ebrahimi Zaker 1
Hojjat Feyzy 2
Mahmood Abdoos 1
1 School of Energy Engineering and Sustainable Resources, College of Interdisciplinary Science and Technology, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
10.22059/ses.2026.406980.1203
Abstract
Due to the rapid and unsustainable growth of energy consumption in Iran and its attendant consequences on the economy, environment, and energy security, the government enacted the Energy Consumption Pattern Reform Law in 2010. This legislation was Iran’s first comprehensive legal regime for the oversight of energy consumption. However, a number of studies have indicated that the enactment of the law has not been successful due to challenges such as institutional ineffectiveness, lack of an enforcement mechanism, and the coordination of multiple agencies. The current study, framed with the concepts of energy governance and policy instrument frameworks, conducts a structural and content analysis of the Energy Consumption Pattern Reform Law, then conducts a comparative analysis on the experiences of selected OECD nations (Germany, Japan, and Denmark) in the domain of energy consumption management and consumption. The comparative analysis indicates that OECD nations manage to reduce energy intensity considerably, which is reflective of the fact that they possess the experience and use of measures that include independent regulatory bodies, targeting incentives, economic instruments and public education programs. These countries have utilized law levels of independence, quantifiable targets, and required regular performance assessments. These measures have limited effectiveness in Iran. Finally, the paper suggests modifications to the energy consumption pattern reform law, improves law enforcement of the policy, creates measurable indicators, and identifies replicable examples from the international community to enhance energy efficiency as part of a sustainable development transition in Iran.
Keywords
Energy Consumption Pattern Reform Law
Energy Governance
Energy Efficiency
Energy Policy
OECD Countries
Subjects
[1]        S. Solaymani, ‘Energy subsidy reform evaluation research – reviews in Iran’, Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 520–538, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.2064.
[2]        H. R. Qureshi et al., ‘Iran’s energy path’, Jan. 2019.
[3]        S. Moshiri, ‘The effects of the energy price reform on households consumption in Iran’, Energy Policy, vol. 79, pp. 177–188, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.01.012.
[4]        M. K. A. B. Barkhordari, ‘An evaluation of the welfare effects of reducing energy subsides in Iran’, 2012, Energy Policy.
[5]        A. Mobini Dehkordi and H. Houri Jafari, ‘Study and analysis of policies and programs to reform consumption patterns and the impact of their implementation on energy intensity in Iran’, Science and Technology Policy Letters, vol. 7, pp. 45–59, 2017.
[6]        ‘Law on reforming energy consumption patterns’, Feb. 2011.
[7]        Z. Hesami, ‘The effectiveness of implementing the resolution to amend the energy and resource consumption pattern in buildings (Case study: Tehran Municipality buildings)’, URBAN ECONOMICS AND PLANNING, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 48–52, 2020.
[8]        Y. Zhou, ‘Worldwide carbon neutrality transition? Energy efficiency, renewable, carbon trading and advanced energy policies’, Energy Reviews, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 100026, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enrev.2023.100026.
[9]        F. Eskafi, ‘Comparative analysis of European Union and Iranian CO2 reduction policies in transportation sector A’, 2016.
[10]      A. Markaz Malmir, ‘A Reflection on the Implementation Requirements of the Law with Emphasis on Development Plan Laws’, Majles & Rahbord, vol. 30, no. 115, pp. 21–58, 2023, doi: 10.22034/mr.2023.5446.5195.
[11]      M. Fereidouni, Farnoud and Mafi, ‘Identification of Factors Affecting Energy Supply and Consumption in Iran with an Approach to Consumption Pattern Reform’, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Air Conditioning and Heating Installations, 2015.
[12]      IEA, ‘World Energy Outlook 2021. International Energy Agency. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2021’, 2023.
[13]      A. S. © Sara Pasquier, ‘Progress Implementing the IEA 25 Energy Efficiency Policy Recommendations’, 2011.
[14]      T. S. 1 and M. Goto, ‘Energy Intensity, Energy Efficiency and Economic Growth among OECD Nations from 2000 to 2019’, energies Article.
[15]      A. Souhankar, A. Mortezaee, and R. Hafezi, ‘Potentials for energy-saving and efficiency capacities in Iran: An interpretive structural model to prioritize future national policies’, Energy, vol. 262, p. 125500, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125500.
[16]      E. Abbasian and A. Souri, ‘The Inefficiency of Energy Pricing Policy: The Case of Iran’, Int. J. Environ. Res., vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 943–950, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s41742-019-00221-9.
[17]      C.-C. Chen, ‘Comparative impacts of energy sources on environmental quality: A five-decade analysis of Germany’s Energiewende’, Energy Reports, vol. 11, pp. 3550–3561, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.03.027.
[18]      A. Canan, ‘Offshore wind energy policy paths: A comparative analysis of Denmark and Germany’, ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, no. 1, pp. 35–59, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.3280/EFE2023-001003.
[19]      M. Sugiyama et al., ‘Japan’s long-term climate mitigation policy: Multi-model assessment and sectoral challenges’, Energy, vol. 167, pp. 1120–1131, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.10.091.
[20]      D. Salite, Y. Miao, and E. Turner, ‘A comparative analysis of policies and strategies supporting district heating expansion and decarbonisation in Denmark, Sweden, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom – Lessons for slow adopters of district heating’, Environ. Sci. Policy, vol. 161, p. 103897, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103897.
[21]      W. N. A. Wan Mohamad and K. Osman, ‘A Systematic Literature Review on Citizen Awareness of Energy’, Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), vol. 7, no. 10, p. e001803, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.47405/mjssh.v7i10.1803.
[22]      H. Weidner, ‘Ups and Downs in Environmental Policy: Japan and Germany in Comparison’, 2020, pp. 25–40. doi: 10.1007/978-3-658-27405-4_3.
[23]      R. Syivarulli, N. A. Pambudi, and C. W. Budiyanto, ‘The global mapping of education and public outreach on geothermal energy’, International Journal of Global Energy Issues, vol. 46, no. 1/2, pp. 176–188, 2024, doi: 10.1504/IJGEI.2024.135263.
[24]      R. Fayaz and B. M. Kari, ‘Comparison of energy conservation building codes of Iran, Turkey, Germany, China, ISO 9164 and EN 832’, Appl. Energy, vol. 86, no. 10, pp. 1949–1955, Oct. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.12.024.
[25]      M. Mirmoghtadaee and S. Seelig B A Assistant, ‘A Comparative Study on the Role of Energy Efficiency in Urban Planning Instruments of Iran and Germany’, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331929028
[26]      T. Hack, Z. Ma, and B. N. Jørgensen, ‘Digitalisation potentials in the electricity ecosystem: lesson learnt from the comparison between Germany and Denmark’, Energy Informatics, vol. 4, no. S2, p. 27, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1186/s42162-021-00168-2.
[27]      S. Taniguchi, ‘Examining the causality structures of electricity interchange and variable renewable energy: a comparison between Japan and Denmark’, Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 159–191, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s41685-019-00120-z.
[28]      U. K. Pata, S. Erdogan, and B. Ozcan, ‘Evaluating the role of the share and intensity of renewable energy for sustainable development in Germany’, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 421, p. 138482, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138482.
[29]      K. Hansen, B. V. Mathiesen, and I. R. Skov, ‘Full energy system transition towards 100% renewable energy in Germany in 2050’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 102, pp. 1–13, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.038.
Journal of sustainable Energy Systems
Volume 5, Issue 4
Autumn 2026
Pages 833-843